Anyone care to explain the embedded screenshot?

Ooof. I don’t know if I’m relieved that this is not a typical dairy-production horror post, or if I’m more horrified at the image it’s actually evoking.

Yeah, I can’t tell if s/he just had trouble finding it, or s/he was trying to… build new words??

Sounds like you know exactly what his wife’s pussy tastes like (you can tell it from the taste of other pussies).

Wäre sicher eine lustige Themenwoche, in der mal alle auch fürs Furzen die KIs um Rat fragen, und dann all die Bullenscheiße, die man als Antwort bekommt, sofort für bare Münze nehmen und damit weiterarbeiten.

EN - EuroNight-Zug?

War er es nicht schon vor dem Merz?

Es war Themenwoche? Nix bemerkt

You mean poor Lich?

That is not a skirt, it’s a necklace

Yes, you do! You murder plants! Millions and gazillions of innocent little plants! #speciesism

Got an archive link?

This is like discussing if everyone should do missionary or backshots.

Thanks, I wasn’t aware of that direct connection, so you’re right with the first arrow! My point was mainly that very rich people tend to adopt and promote any philosophy or ideology that supports their being rich and/or getting richer. Which in the case of Peter Singer is ironic, because you cannot, of sound mind, subscribe to his ideas and be/stay rich at the same time. Those people claiming to practice effective altruism in the vein of Singer is ofc a contradiction in itself. Possibly they have developed a billionaire-branded offshoot of it that makes work in their favor. Coincidentally, I’ve heard of Singer’s moral argument in one context, and of EA only ever in the tech billionaire context until today - hence my first comment.

I doubt the first arrow, and the direction of subsequent ones. More like tech billionaires > effective “altruism”… > tax evasion…

Wenn man sogar als Hochstapler das Hochstaplersyndrom hat…

How do we report this to mods?

“…just illegal drugs for me, thanks!”

Tbh, that doesn’t really answer my question.