

you’d still have to boot from cd, but i do recall one of the early versions happily moving everything from your old windows install. i’m still moving around my wife’s files from her xp install every time i need to set up a new /home part for her.


you’d still have to boot from cd, but i do recall one of the early versions happily moving everything from your old windows install. i’m still moving around my wife’s files from her xp install every time i need to set up a new /home part for her.


With the laws of supply and demand, simply reducing our collective demand makes the industry smaller.
this simply isn’t true.
this is the second day of Christmas. I got 10 more


throwing ordnances at matt walsh


kolektiva did not mean to give it up. it was poor security practice: keeping old drives unencrypted, and getting busted on other charges

sunshine isn’t an anarchist, they are an instigator
anarchism is socialist. it’s often called libertarian socialist.
exarcheia, and the Paris commune
multiplayer shooters with unlockable weapons/classes
you haven’t read any critical rationalists, and it shows.
edit: I accidentally a couple letters, but look at this fucking bad faith and proud ignorance
edit: it’s understandable I guess that when your worldview is threatened, you slink off pretending you were right all along.
now who looks ignorant
duvergers “law” is more of a tautology. it doesn’t describe any actual natural phenomenon like gravity does
duverger’s law is a tautology because, from a critical rationalist perspective, a tautological statement cannot be empirically tested or falsified. it’s true by definition. duverger’s law states that a plurality-rule election system tends to favor a two-party system. however, if this law is framed in such a way that any outcome can be rationalized within its parameters, then it becomes unfalsifiable.
for example, if a country with a plurality-rule system has more than two parties, one might argue that the system still “tends to” favor two parties, and the current state is an exception or transition phase. this kind of reasoning makes the law immune to counterexamples, and thus, it operates more as a tautological statement than an empirical hypothesis.
the critical rationalist critique of marginalist economics, which relies on ceteris paribus (all else being equal) conditions, suggests any similarly structured law should be viewed with skepticism. for duverger’s law to be more than a tautology, it would need to be stated in a way that allows for clear empirical testing and potential falsification, without the possibility of explaining away any contradictory evidence. this would make it a substantive theory that can contribute to our understanding of political systems rather than a mere tautology.
Both sides"ing Democrats in general elections helps MAGA, that is a simple fact.
wrong
saying it doesn’t make it so.
a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
wrong on all accounts
there is no evidence they support fascists
we can see who is dancing


checkout the NoKings protests
I have a filter in emacs called “dotfiles.org”
I use the tangle feature to write them out