You can’t fight against capitalism with violence, this cause only more violence and suffering. Because the elite has all the force and weapons, apart to turn with it the oligarchs in martyrs, justifying more oppression. You can use votes, demonstrations, strikes. boycotts, sabotage. education and intelligence to fight the system, using it’s flaws against it.

China challenge US WHAT??, Half of used products and technology in the US are made in China, even the MAGA hats.

Al so soft and clean

I know a lot of people leaving the US, and murdering villages in the US…only currently not, at least now with citizens they do, but also in the rest of the world since more than half a century until today

Are you sure? I’m not so, Myanmar and Congo are scary and dangerous for their citizens, USA is scary and dangerous for their citizens AND the rest of the World.

The right one sponsored by Exxon and CIA, as always

I never had a doubt since more than half a century about the USA. it’s a third world country with too much weapons and money in the hands of greedy Hillbillies. Trump is only a logical consequence of it.

No differences to asking Grok. Before, the Americans used dart games on a map with regions with oil

I’m more concerned of the slop machines used by gov and army

Grok is the Asshole of the AIs, and is used not only by Trump but also the to go AI from the US army and the Pentagon. What can go wrong? (where can I buy iodine pills? asking for a friend)

That is the point. I tested almost all existing browsers since a quarter century now and the mencioned are the best for me and my needs. Simple philosophy, search, compare and finding something better, use it, more if it is an EU product.

I’m happy with Vivaldi since over 10 Years and Zen as second, both European Browsers (Norway and Spain) which don’t sell my data and my soul. Ethics respect the user and transparency are very important for me and Brave don’t offer it, but shady business models. Thanks

Yes, private use is always legal, copyright is this, that in copyrighted content you need an permission and you have to pay if you want publicate it, like for the Eiffel Tower, there you need the permission of the company and you have to pay money for it. Same for the Eiffel Tower by Night or an downloaded Video. The exception are only contents without copyright (eg. CC, GPL licenses) like images, animations, music and videos from eg. Pixabay, which are all free to download and use even for commercial uses.

This copyright laws are also the cause that a lot of cinemas have closed, because they had to pay thousends of € for the right to project a movie in public. In times of VHS tapes, I had a friend which had a franchise of an Blockbuster shop, he had to pay several 100 bucks for every tape, to have the right to rent it to the people.

Copyright is big business, but for the industry and big companies, less for the authors, which mostly only receive some % of the money. Reason because artists prefer to use eg. Bandcamp, where they can sell directly their work, or to do it in their concerts, selling USB and CD, showing this way the middlefinger to these companies.

Media content with more than 70 years is mostly public domain and free to use, with some exceptions, like Chaplin movies which still have copyright by the Chaplin family.

Even a cámara, you are violate the copyright when you make a photo from the iluminated Eiffel Tower by night or some historic buildings and use it in a publication. Cpyright yes, but in the way it make sense.

No, copyright make sense and is important, but it need a redefinition to protect the right of the author and not the abuses of an greedy industry. Most of the real piracy and violations of the copyright nowadays is made by the generative AIs of this industry and big corps, not by the users.

First of all, downloading a song for private use isn’t piracy, before internet people recorded songs from the radio with an magnetophone or cassettes, nothing new. It’s piracy if you use the downloaded song commercial, selling copies or reproduce it in public. An tool to download media has nothing to do with piracy same as any other device to record and store songs are not. Even the VLC player or others, capable to record songs would be with this a piracy tool. These are things that happen when the industry prescribe old stupid politicians, who confuse a remote control with a smartphone, what laws should they make in their favor.

Yeah, for sure, slop only can be fixed with slop

Yes different times, . Public in the Phone book, but as result sometimes only an flyer in your mail box and not of cause the phone book, but random. With phones tied to an cable, privacy issues are not a theme. If they don’t know your name or your city, the phone book isn’t usefull, less when there are several with the same name, Sara Connor.

I see me in 2029 using the Finger Protocol.