I hate you so much right now.

What a surprise. Strip out the equipment that can unequivocally know that there’s a solid object in front of you and you drive into solid objects from time to time.

No it is absolutely not theft. It is not theft by law. (There’s a reason why we have both “theft” and “infringement” in the lawbooks: they’re different things!) It is not theft morally. (Theft removes the owner’s ability to use something. Infringement does not. Infringement is a lesser moral crime if it is a crime at all.)

Please do not fall into the trap the IP holders like to lay by equating theft and infringement in your mind. You can have your opinions on whether infringement is bad or not (and the facts are … complicated with both sides being largely full of shit on this), but it is a matter of fact that theft and infringement are entirely different things.

Use the right term for the offence. Don’t let IP holders’ deliberate conflation to confuse the issue get to you.

Oh no! Talentless louts don’t like people who’ve cultivated actual skills that people appreciate!

…

Wait, remind me: Whom does this inconvenience?

I’m pretty sure it is too. For starters the part that’s been layered on top doesn’t have that suspicious 50/50 light/dark thing going on that gives away so many AI generations.

This is obviously wrong? Three baby elephants inside a soda can means about 650,000kg/m³ if I haven’t screwed up the thumbnail estimates. IIRC the densest element we know is osmium and that’s “only” about 25,000kg/m³ (give or take some since it’s been ages since I learned anything like this).

Wow! He has enough self-awareness to figure this out! (Not yet enough to actually stop being a human being made entirely of intestinal effluent mind. Baby steps.)

Toward the end they mention also the bit about the writing also being bullshit generators, no?

To paraphrase someone far more clever than me: “If you can’t be bothered to actually write it, I can’t be bothered to read it.”

True. The actual percentage is likely far higher.

That looks like it could be a fun (albeit really heavy) instrument to play.

A record high number of Nazis found social media that would tolerate them.

Ooh! That IS interesting. Half-harp, half-piano.

I don’t get it. It’s a piano built sideways? The person taking the video isn’t really showing the context of all the details they’re filming.

This seems to be endemic to billionaires. Robotman forces people to lose to him in a board game. Ketamine Kiddie pays people to play his video games for him so he can seem “elite”. What are we going to find out about Bezos next? That he forces people to play poker with him with the card faces turned his way?

Woohoo! Finally a company I can boycott that’s not already in my boycott of all American companies!

He can be both: really awkward and a Nazi. Or am I huffing paint thinner?

Again, judges don’t GIVE A SHIT what you call it. They give a shit what things ARE.

And they will utterly fucking smack Tesla over this.

Judges aren’t stupid people (at least not in Canada; can’t vouch for American judges seeing some of the decisions Down South). You’re not going to fool them by renaming things. That’s the kind of view of law that a toddler would hold. “I didn’t spill my juice because I call it … ah … foobles now!”

Yeah, I imagine it stings.

That’s OK. I learned more than a few things about my nation of citizenship when I moved abroad and watched it from afar. A lot of them stung badly. You get over it; even get motivated to try to undo some of the bad things.

Allow me to fix that for you:

computer scientists: We have invented virtual dumbasses who are constantly wrong: Tech CEOs.