I agree. I’m not here to argue that the limitations are perfect, they should definitely be refined and flaws should be pointed out such as in the post itself. But it’s important to recognize the reason that the limitations have been implemented on the heavier side are to compensate for the AI still being stupid. It’s a better safe than sorry approach and I would imagine these restrictions will gradually slacken as the AI improves.

You have a reasonable take that just wanted to remind people that there could still be improvements, but I just wanted to say this as there are people that exaggerate these inconveniences. I honestly appreciate the direct, involved approach I’m seeing from developers over the lazy, laid-back approach that I was really afraid of.

What the slippery slope did you just say to me you little strawman? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in appealing to emotion, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on loaded questions. I am trained in fallacy warfare and I’m the top debater in my entire high school. You are nothing to me but just another bandwagon. I will attack your character instead of engaging with your argument with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this site, mark my anecdotes. You think you can get away with making logically sound arguments over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak, I am contacting my secret network of trolls across the Internet and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for our fallacies, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call logic. You’re no fucking scotsman, kid. I can be ambiguous anywhere, anytime, and I can derail your discussion in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my false cause. Not only am I extensively trained in irrational argumentation, but I have access to the entire arsenals of comments sections that I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable argument off this continent. If only you could have known what unholy middle ground your little “logical” argument was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking burden of proof. But you couldn’t, you you didn’t, and now you’re begging the question, you black or white idiot. I will shit ad hominem all over you and you will appeal to nature in it. Tu quoque, kiddo.

People should point out flaws. OP obviously doesn’t need chatgpt to make this list either, they’re just interacting with it.

I will say it’s weird for OP to call it tiptoey and to be “really frustrated” though. It’s obvious why these measures exist and it’s goofy for it to have any impact on them. It’s a simple mistake and being “really frustrated” comes off as unnecessary outrage.

I was just saying that bc it seemed too cynical when you said we didn’t need to hear about it at all. I guess I don’t 100% know his intent either but there hasn’t been any reason to doubt it so far.

It’s not anti-feminist to laugh at the irony of saying no to the MIB writer clarifying the origins of the story. It’s just a goofy story lol.

There is no other way

It’s when it happens in excess that it’s ADHD. ND disabilities (from my understanding I’m not a doctor) are typically normal things that everyone experiences that are happening in excess. Everyone fidgets with things, everyone’s mind wanders, it’s totally normal to be distracted, but when it’s frequent and severe enough to interrupt your daily obligations does it become a disability.