Yeah, deserts are a bit out of place here

Oh wow, you are (generally) right. Of course, it depends on beans and conditions, but some farmers even add nitrogen fertilizers to the beans :O

You can’t execute 268m people (75% of the population) very easily. You can let disease, famine, political violence do that more you.

I think that, at least short-term, the harshest effects of the WHO exit will be felt outside the US. Like, big parts of Africa already feel the sudden cancellation of USAID. Though within the US, you guys also have the anti-vaxx and general anti-modern-medicine movement, that got crazy influential.

Having said that, you seem to have a much better overview of their ideology and their plans. I hope they are wrong in overestimating the feasibility of that plan.

Having said that, living outside and away from US I tend to see it as a lesser evil when the US sabotages its international strength. The dollar loosing significance would be a big one. But I might be naive. Especially if it helps/speeds up the fascist takeover.

I hope that the US not paying fees to WHO will caution other lenders, and the dollar will go down soon.

Oh, I thought they already left. So there will be even more damage to global health programs now…

I wish the USAns can do it peacefully. But I feel desperate about anything that will work against their fascist government and business.

Honestly - however grim it might sound - I kinda hope so. The way US acts internationally, a civil war would at least involve one country, not many.

I didn’t know solar panel murals were a thing. This is a w e s o m e!

I’m actually also confused how the difference does not depend on the perspective. If we say supply is too high, then it is overcapacity. If we say demand is too low, it is underutilization. For a profit-driven company, it is overcapacity, I understand that. But Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world has a point, when we look at it from the perspective of the rest of us…

And I guess you would address overcapacity and underutilization differently. Overcapacity -> reduce production. Underutilization -> increase consumption (“installation” in this case sounds more fitting). To say that it is clearly an overcapacity issue sounds to me as if there is no way we could install more solar panels.

I would prefer to see the coal plants toppled first

I don’t want to be such a bummer, but coal being up overall is still disturbing

Generally, great stuff, keep ongoing.

Still, the map of the “Industrial Workers of the World” makes me go XD

What do you mean by “The System is (Not) Totalizing”?

They could link to the original report. I guess they mean this one:

https://sdgtransformationcenter.org/reports/sustainable-development-report-2025

Though the graph they show is more promising, with wind having a complementary pattern to solar. If reliable, it would be great.

You can still see a spike in gas around Feb 2025, when wind was weaker and there was still little irradiation.

Ain’t solar (compared to wind) so-and-so idea in most of the EU? I mean, unless you are in southern Italy, southern Spain, or Greece, you you’ll need that gas to survive the winter.

I mean - one thing ugly, and the other thing is that this land could be arable or a nature reserve.

The hill in the photo looks ugly, tbh. Still, much better (and livelier) than the landscape after oilsands or brown coal extraction.

Preferably, most grid-connected solar panels would be on buildings, deserts, and postindustrial land. But in the face of the climate catastrophe, the South China hills are also fine.

*Robots and humans to build Canada’s 9-storey timber tower together

I guess we should just do more offshore wind at home, in Europe ¯_(ツ)_/¯

And support wind elsewhere. I know that in much of the world, solar is more feasible. But I am also sure there are places where access to electricity and pollution are problems at the same time, and where wind would be a better option.