He/Him
A lot of the ‘debunking’ here is very poor, it assumes Stallman’s innocence at every junction, argues that Stallman’s word is more important than his actions, fails to engage with the full complexity of arguments against him, and more than once uses “but he’s tender hearted, so he can’t be bad” as an argument.
Certainly not “rational and objective” like it claims.
Yeah I think this it - it’s to accommodate companions; technically the ability is not on a card in your actual deck/battlefield (making Rule 10 not applicable?) but an extra deck mechanic like Un-set contraptions, stickers etc. (although I do not know how “assemble a contraption” works on the one legal contraption card?).
EDIT: Also the inclusion of “traditional card(s)” probably gives companion wriggle room.
I would say that pure monetary value does effect power but with highly diminishing returns and even at the lowest cost the synergy and construction of the deck is more important.
The most expensive card I own is Sheoldred, The Apocalypse - and I always take her out of my decks because she just doesn’t synergise with them. Yeah it’s powerful, yeah it doesn’t weaken my infect deck (for example), but a dirt cheap Blightbelly Rat is far more valuable to me in that deck if I want to do the things my deck is supposed to do, have fun, and have a good chance of winning.
Recommendation for Posteo - best email provider I’ve used and it’s ridiculously affordable.
Thanks for recommendation - that looks perfect; will try it out!
Oh Arcanum is a great pick!
And you’re right, Fallout’s not exactly forgotten - although it was a cult hit at the time, and I’d argue the original still is in a way.
I’d heartily recommend Fallout 1, with a less enthusiastic recommendation for Fallout 2
RMS is a huge figure head and representative of free software, so it matters what he says and does.
I have seen no-one argue that everything RMS has said is bunk because of this, personally I think he has had some good ideas, sure; but that doesn’t mean I just ignore everything else because “its politics and not free Software related”.
Free Software is in itself political, maybe the links between RMS’s words and actions, and Free Software are not direct or even close - but separating “politics” and Free Software just seems like burying your head in the sand.