Oh OK, how do you know they were sarcastic since it’s currently 1-1 on how it was interpreted?
Or is that just a justification because they’re emphatically supporting you?
Edit: seems like it’s 2-3 in my favor so maybe more people need that than you think?
You agreed you’re a piece of work but not that you’re literally copying racist rapists abusive strategies despite the evidence above, so you only partially agreed…
And yeah, I’m going for the full agreement when people act like that.
Are you already misremembering and rewriting the story to make yourself seem better? Another great example.
It started when I said op could technically be doxxing, you disagreed without any reasoning behind it, and I replied with the legal definition saying why it probably was even though it didn’t have a “call to intent”. Then you attacked me personally because you didn’t like being wrong.
It’s in the thread and easily provable… no idea why you’re now claiming that I said you doxxed me.
I mean, you did just do personal attacks with no evidence because you didn’t like being wrong…
So it seems you’re already well within that wheelhouse
Any evidence to support that or are you just as bad as the racist rapist in chief?
It’s a personal attack that was unwarranted and which should be deleted and banned if the community rules were being followed.
It in no way feels satirical considering that there was no provocation for it aside from me responding with evidence as to why it might appear as doxxing.
Y’all could have just said “and we’re ok with that considering they use those strategies regularly” since that would be justification and not a personal attack.
Oh I don’t disagree, I just didn’t want you to get deleted over doxxing. That’s why I made the comment, and if you notice in no part was it against the action or critical of being open about these shits who abuse our systems.
You just used calling people pedophiles as an example and you did that to me two comments up so…
Seems like your logic is off a bit.
So you did a stochastic terrorism on me? Cool.
Posting a person’s address, picture, full name, and a list of personal faults that is supported by evidence which would likely cause people to reach out and contact the person over their actions.
Doxxing is “posting private or identifying information about an individual without the person’s consent, usually with malicious intent”.
So yeah, without the intent but it could be considered doxxing.
Unless you have some actual evidence or a counter argument to make instead of “nuh uh”?
Could be considered doxxing though there is no specific call to harass.
Turns out that in the bill there is apparently a part that specifies any material withheld for investigative purposes needs a non redacted summary delivered in its place. So the authors seem to have some checks in place for shenanigans
They did say fish and chips which is kind of an iconic British food.
Right? I’ve never had more than an extra 20lbs to lose so I guess I know nothing about weight management.
Plateauing with a growing population and industry is pretty good. Give it a few years to stabilize and swap more over and we should see a continual decrease to a minimum threshold (from things that produce emissions that can’t be swapped like cement creation). Much better than we see in other developed countries, and in one of the largest contributors to date. Good reasons for some hope.
He got the brain worm infusion from RFK Jr
You don’t get to sling the first shot unprovoked and then get mad when the other party doesn’t accept your version.
And sure it’s me, not the person roaming the various posts insulting other users and being hateful, that is harming people’s mental health. Do you even read what you write?