It’s one of the greatest sadnesses I can name. We were shown it was possible, and in many cases beneficial, and yet… We went back.

Agreed, but I think we have to be the change we want to see in the fediverse.

The new Google 9 comes with 4 wheels so you can drive it without carrying it. We had to remove a bunch of features to fit the wheels and rc antenna, stuff like the phone capability, installing non-Google content, and anything that could prevent ads, Firefox is no longer something you can use, but it’s worth it for zoomy phone functionality.

Also there’s a subscription fee now or you have to listen to ads before your call.

Holy shit, it’s meta Margot Robbie.

Holy shit it’s Margot Robbie.

Copywriter here. I couldn’t agree more. The problem is many corporate management types will view it this way because it requires too much thinking to understand and they don’t do that sort of thing.

Bless them, the majority I have worked with have only just about got their heads around SEO and Google ranking, so with AI, a lot of them are already asking me what the difference is.

The difference is the objective and input. An AI can’t yet truly understand the idea of meeting objectives in a creative way. Likewise, input doesn’t come with the decades of cultural understanding that a human is evolved to pick up.

The problem, and the same could be said for most things, is rich people with poor brains.

Still, no doubt many are already losing their jobs to it, only for the management to realise they fucked up big time when ChatGPT goes down when they need priority copy at short notice.

Could you explain more? I like this idea

Don’t forget, next year they need to hit 104% the amount they did this year. Crank up the prices!

Not combat specific, but x4 is a solid title. Combats a bit basic, but the empire and fleet management means you’ll be in some pretty huge battles.