

To clarify, I’m replying to the OP, not the article.


To clarify, I’m replying to the OP, not the article.


As long as they’re not defacing, degrading, or destroying anything, its nobodies business how another person appreciates nature. Wtf is this gatekeeping bullshit?


Probably, but Jar Jar was the least of that trilogies problems.
Anyone asking where this is from, watch it! Its soooo goooood!


That’s every dating platform.


The wealthy are trying to make a final power grab and pivot us into authoritarianism, but they need to move all the pieces into place before they can make it final.


I’ve written fifteen words on the matter prior to this comment. Not sure how that is considered getting defensive. Methinks you’re projecting.
I said real jobs are physically demanding and soul sucking. You literally replied they really aren’t, and then went on to elaborate on how you didn’t believe they were soul-sucking. Sure thing bud. I have no reason to humor your lying ass. Bye felicia.


According to cultural geographer Colin Woodard there are as many as eleven cultural areas of the United States, which spring from their settlement history.
Strong cultural differences have a long history in the U.S., with the southern slave society in the antebellum period serving as a prime example.
Sure sounds like one unified culture to me!
I get that, but “illegal” doesn’t make anyone sound like a rapist or a murderer either.
You literally did…


Kind of impossible to fix IMO. The editing and pacing isn’t particularly egregious. The direction, the dialogue, the stilted acting, and the overuse of CGI are the main problems, and short of cutting out the worst offenders, you can’t change that.


The depiction of a racist character (the character themself is a racist) isn’t necessarily racist in and of itself, unless the film endorses it in some way. It can be used as commentary, to highlight the reality of a specific time or place, or to show what kind of person that character is. The racist depiction of a character (a character that is portrayed in a racist manner, such as one that displays racial stereotypes) is more often than not a reflection of the filmmakers personally held racist beliefs, though in some rare cases can also be used as a commentary.


deleted by creator


There’s a difference between a character being a racist and characterization being racist.


I like how you spelled basterds correctly but got inglourious wrong.


Politics in film can be interesting when it is executed well. The problem with the prequels wasn’t necessarily the ideas, but the execution was just awful.
It actually doesn’t. That’s your own bias showing through.
I worked many real jobs too and they absolutely were soul-sucking. You are fortunate your jobs didn’t suck that hard and your experience is not universal.
Steaming may be soul-sucking in unique ways, but that doesn’t negate the ways other jobs can be soul-sucking. If we’re all soulless husks at the end of the day, what the fuck does it matter how you got there?
So show up in a biohazard suit.