Fucking Instagram and their Web interface. Try to get the maximum video size on a horizontal screen. Bonus points when a horizontal video is uploaded to their vertical frame optimised viewer.
I did the math before: it was literally less than 1% of my screen. There’s no full screen feature.
Not like it cost them even a measurable amount of money to have one developed. They keep it awful intentionally to get you to install the app. Fuck companies like that.
We also call it mill in our language. I also used to play it a lot with my grandma. Corns vs beans.
It definitely still exists, maybe even popular. It might be just my subjective observation, but it feels like it used to be (even) more popular.
BTW this used to be a rather popular type of flooring. Whenever I entered a flat like that, it was screaming ‘sixties’ from everywhere. I’m not sure whether it was the same in other countries, but this seemed to be the go-to flooring type, unless they opted for the cheaper PVC (?) solution.
Lazy copy of the outcome:
As such, the results have indicated that large breasts can be notably aerodynamic through the reduction of drag and lift. The Flat model incurred a 4% maximum drag increase com- pared to the Normal model, with an average of approximately 2% span- ning velocities from 1 to 30 m⋅s-1. The Flat model also experienced more lift, with a maximum difference being 32% and averaging 22%. As illustrated, the mechanism behind the drag and lift behaviors ob- served between both models was elucidated through the analysis of streamlines around the body and the structures associated with TKE; the Normal model provides advantageously lower drag and lift by the gen- eration of stronger vortices from the legs, which in turn originates from the action of the breasts redirecting the flow around the torso. From what has been presented in this preliminary work, it is safe to conclude that the phrase “Flat is Justice” is deficient aerodynamically.
deleted by creator
3: Eat and drink flesh
Horizontal band member here. If I have to take a photo of a wardrobe, my whole self, a jumping giraffe or the Empire States Building, you can be sure as heck I’ll hold the phone vertically. The only reason for me to take a horizontal photo of my fridge is when it fell on my foot.
Same thing goes vice versa: vertically filming a scenery, a dish, my mom’s panties or a seesaw is plain dumb, unless there’s something else that justifies the awful framing.
BUT when you make a video for the purpose of uploading it to sites like YouTube… You can’t convince me vertical would make more sense. I understand that it’s the same problem if it’s a vertically aligned app (I could go on a 3 day rant about Instagram not allowing horizontal - or any - full screen on desktop), but decent portals do it properly. If you have a phone and you want to watch vertical stuff, problem solved. If you have a phone and want to watch horizontal stuff, just rotate your damn screen, it’s a no-brainer. But when you have a monitor, you can’t (always) just turn it 90 degrees and watch vertical stuff full screen.
Because of lazy uploaders AND lazy management/devs, there are countless of cases where a full screen video has actual content on less than 10% of the screen, because a horizontal video was uploaded to a vertical site, then you open it on a horizontal monitor and it plays like
+--------+
| |
|---[]---|
| |
+--------+
Nah mate, last time I tried that it was quite a job moving it to the oven from the toilet bowl.
This is why I eat it with the wrapper still on.
As lazy as it sounds, once your thing allows other things to fit in a van, having stuff delivered to your home has a smaller footprint than everyone collecting them in their own cars.
Unless, of course, you can take it home on your bike, or something.
How about naming the town after a city in Austria, but still the Roman way? Not just once, not just twice, but
(EDIT: I’m having déja vu after the last time had I brought up the several dozen Springfields)
I’d like to see that osmosis happen between the last two frames.
Those cartons are not meteor strike proof. I have bought cracked eggs in cartons several times before. That’s when I started inspecting the contents before buying them.
They can crack before/while they get in the carton. Those cartons are handled by various people, transported under varying conditions. Even if they get to the shelf unscathed, any other customer might accidentally knock them off and just put them back like nothing happened.
Also, if you (as a man) think that showing you two men kissing might turn you gay then I’ve got news for you.
A true, confidently heterosexual man won’t suddenly get turned on by men, even if you show them the entire 1973 Construction Worker Calendar. Same goes for women vice versa, but it’s usually the men that are the loudest about this.
However, if you think your sexuality has always been rock solid (😏) then why do you assume the opposite of everyone else?
Haha, yeah, she’s not a 1:1 doppelgänger. Just one from the top of my head that looks somewhat similar, if you squint and ignore the humongous mammaries on the posted image.
And I still have tinnitus from that cover.
Easy, just bend the battery.
Not quite. Unless she’s a “new” face from the past 7-8 years. The closest I can think of is Gabriella Tóth, but she’s like an unschooled butt licker of the previous government (Fidesz/Orbán), and has a quite scandalous background with a rather bad reputation.
But, to be fair, considering Fidesz’s smear campaigns and troll farms, she might even be the face for it.
It doesn’t even need a hypothetical society. In my language there is one word for he/she(/it). It’s genderless. The rest is the same: genderless. Almost everything is pretty much the same as in English - it gets tricky when translating he/she type disambiguity situations in books and films, though.
You just get the gender from context, when it’s needed. You’d be surprised to see how often it’s not.