Same woman btw 🫩 There have been people put in straightjackets for less 🙃 But don’t worry guys at least they’re getting rid of the religious extremists in Iran 🤦‍♂️

Bro Amerikkka, the world’s laughing at you 😂 I’m convinced that place is not real, a simulation. The most unserious country in the world

Also back in the day that kind of heresy would get you hanged, drawn and quartered or burnt at the stake if you were a woman like her (for the sake of decency since the victim was disembowelled and chopped into 4 pieces while still alive and burning was considered more lenient out of the 2 somehow) we should probably bring that back.

Canada’s biggest mistake was letting it burn rather than taking it back. Would’ve saved the world a lot of hassle for the following 200 years 😮‍💨

Glad we’re on the same page. I too pray for violence against the US armed forces and the Israeli Death Forces from the IRGC 🙂

Boom Boom Tel Aviv 💥 Tel Aboom

There’s just something so uplifting about watching vieeos of Gazans cheering the sight of Iranian missiles raining down on and lighting up the sky of Israel Occupied Palestine while the rats hide in the sewer and flee the sinking ship 🥲

Ah so it must be the crack that helps them make money.

This post inspired me to get addicted to crack.

I’ve got OCD as well so reading that I had to reaffirm in my head that that is in fact not the case otherwise my OCD would’ve considered it a threat and gone into panic mode 🙃 🫩

The UK has been doing that since '01 but only under the so-called “terrorism” act passed by notorious terrorist war criminal and Larry Ellison’s bestie Tony Blair, who’s currently so far inside him, his rectum’s bleeding. Essentially the police can arrest you under no reasonable grounds, keep you detained indefinitely and you lose your right to private legal counsel (you’re not allowed to speak to your solicitor/lawyer in private) and your right to silence, if you refuse to answer ANY questions you’ll automatically be charged with TERRORISM and be branded a terrorist from then on, and you legally have to unlock any personal devices on your person under the exact same threat, refusal will be met with a terrorism charge.

It’s literally almost exclusively used in a politically motivated manner and against political dissidents mostly at border checks. It was used against Palestine Action protesters before their ban was overturned by the High Court and Worker’s Party leader George Galloway and his wife when he was arrested by armed counter-terror police at Gatwick sending them into exile (love him or hate him or whatever you think of him, doesn’t matter really - he’s definitely got some “unique” views - that’s obviously a disgusting, Orwellian and draconian form of political persecution to say the least)

The police don’t need any good reason and more often than not the order comes directly from the govt. The only reason it doesn’t violate the Human Rights Act or European Convention on Human Rights is because it invokes the very vague “national security” exemption which is almost always “this is a matter of national security, trust me bro” and when they get asked for the justification of WHY it’s so-called national security related they always say they can’t disclose the justification because that’s very conveniently to do with “national security” as well.

Okay I’ve said this so many times but (open source) code is speech and thus protected by free speech laws. Also idk if anyone’s noticed but it’s pretty obvious ID verification is for mass surveillance and obbo purposes. Now why would this apply to software that we already know doesn’t spy on you? Until now, proprietary software and big tech platforms already spied on you, but it could - to an extent be pseudonymised. This isn’t about spying on people, they already do that, it’s about removing pseudonymisation - instead of your data being stored under: User #2044820 it’ll be your full govt name and address leaving no room for doubt or plausible deniability.

It is by every metric, useless to provide ID verification for software that collects no data, at best it would just give them a better idea of the demographic. Also it’s literally open source, the GPL prohibits disallowing people from forking/editing it and it prohibits restrictions on the way in which it can be edited, which is legally binding.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

The Zionist, Herzl invented it in 1897. Most Nazis were however Zionists themselves.

Zionism and Nazism - GDF

Removed by mod

Edit: for context the first clip is an extract from a book by an early Zionist talking about the racial pseudoscience and justifications behind the Zionist project.

Original video

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Lewandowskiiii 🇵🇱