The stuff I do:
Smuggies: https://thebad.website/
Mastodon: https://hsnl.social/@Bad

I post my work on these Lemmy communities:
English: !thebadwebsite@lemmy.world
French: !lemauvaissite@jlai.lu

  • 497 Posts
  • 828 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2025

help-circle







  • Bad@jlai.lutoFediverse@lemmy.worldSome thoughts after 3 years on Lemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Just so yall know who some of you are agreeing with, this person managed to get permanently booted off the !france@jlai.lu community which is very VERY tolerant of differing opinions compared to the average fediverse community. I remember them, they kept defending racist news outlets for no good reason and using far right talking points and dogwhistles (while claiming to be a leftist), until the mods got tired of their constant denial.

    Modlog (and this post’s comment section) shows some genocide denial too, no shit they don’t feel welcome in some communities…

    One of the points of moving to Lemmy, for me at least, was to get away from people like them.




  • Well yes, the issue is precisely with what you are taught in school vs what is in history books.

    Gandhi was the culmination of centuries of violent anti-colonial struggle. While he was doing non-violent resistance in the wake of a war, the HSRA and Anushilan Samiti acted as violent threats to incentivize the UK to work with Gandhi or risk more terrorist acts, while various extremely violent soldier mutinies weakened the british grip on the country.

    MLK only worked because of the implications. The panthers, urban uprisings, Malcolm X were setting the country ablaze. MLK’s platform was that there were two options, dealing with him or dealing with the rioters. The white house had no choice due to the scale of the riots and the threat of an escalation in violent tactics (panthers were starting to show up with big guns).

    In both cases, what won was the diversity of tactics. The non-violent face of those events are all that’s taught in school, but the full picture of those movements can be found in the history books. You are in no position to be dismissive of others when you are the person in the comic.








  • Well I’m french, in my country strikes are considered violent actions.

    As is always the case, it’s the oppressors not the oppressed that set the level of violence.

    You don’t get to decide whether your actions will be violent or not, it’s all about how the state will react to them. If they start sending riot police at you with orders to be as brutal as possible, legislating against your strikes, sending organizers to jail, killing some of your protesters, the non violent aspect might collapse quite fast. Or at least that’s what happens when we organize mass strikes or student protests in France, and we have a pretty big history of that :)




  • Bad@jlai.luOPtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldPlease resist responsibly
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    Sure, and where does diversity of tactics rank?

    It’s rarely one or the other, eg. Suffragettes demonstrations were made much more threatening by the bombing campaigns that were happening in parallel, Gandhi was made much more threatening by the HSRA campaigns, MLK wouldn’t have achieved jack without urban uprisings and the black panthers turning up the pressure in the background, etc.