@0x1C3B00DA - eviltoast
  • 9 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 16th, 2024

help-circle








  • PWAs were not liked when they came out.

    By some ppl. There were also ppl who did like them. As soon as the desktop support was axed, fans of the feature started complaining immediately.

    at the time, people in general did not like PWAs as a concept. Independent of the browser

    Again, I think this is a sampling issue, because my experience was the complete opposite.

    And one of the key parts of PWA features was the “Progressive” part. The site works without those features and you don’t have to use them so removing the support never made much sense to me.






  • that looks like a console

    Not just looks, but provides the UX of a console. So you buy it, plug it up, log in, and immediately start playing. Even consoles don’t provide that streamlined UX anymore, but ppl want all the benefits console used to provide with all the benefits PC gaming provides now. But the key part is the PC benefits don’t get in the way of the ease of it. You don’t have to install or administer a linux distro, you don’t have to twiddle settings for every game (unless you want to), etc





  • If you break that up you end up with only a few large and likely advertisement funded instances being able to survive.

    I’m not saying I don’t think instances should be able to use that model, only that I think that model should not be the dominant way of building a community on the fediverse. But I don’t see why a user would be less attached to a community just because its hosted on a different server from them, especially on the threadiverse which is topic based and where users are most likely going to engage in multiple topics.


  • Super disagree. A community at the protocol level can have just as much character as a community at the network level, but without most of the drawbacks. The “instance as community” idea was always a poor substitute for actual Groups. The community shouldn’t be a server that users are bound to; it should be a Group that has access controls and private memberships (if desired). The moderators get all the same benefits of maintaining a limited community with their own rules, but users aren’t beholden to petty drama via instance blocks or defederation.





  • “Morels are more likely to cause intestinal distress if eaten raw, although even raw, they can be tolerated by some people,” the agency wrote. Morels should be cooked before eating, as cooking can destroy bacterial contaminants. “For that matter, all mushrooms, wild or cultivated, should be cooked to release their full nutritional value because chitin in their cell walls otherwise inhibits digestion,” the USDA writes.

    The article mentions multiple times that cooked mushrooms are safer than raw ones.






  • for profit corporation being able to suck up your posts is probably what has many upset

    They can already do that without a bridge. And it doesn’t “suck up your posts”. It works just like any other instance. They have to search for you and follow you. Then they receive posts going forward, but they won’t get historical posts.

    I personally would block such a service

    Good! You can do that and that is a perfectly reasonable solution. That’s part of what has ppl upset on the other side of this argument. All of this arguing and vitriol is happening over a service that you can block like any other fediverse actor.