Semantics is divisive - eviltoast

The infighting needs to stop.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    The difference is fixing it doesn’t require destroying. Its rarely ever easier to rebuild something from the ground up than it is to fix an issue.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It’s rarely ever possible to fix something that is fundamentally and compositionally flawed. No one is arguing that it’s easier. They’re arguing that it’s necessary.

      Always looking for what’s easy instead of what’s necessary is part of how we got here in the first place.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Simply destroying something is the easy road. Because it means you don’t have to think about what the problem is, only know that it’s bad.

        It’s definitely harder to build something from nothing, but that’s not the “solution” being offered. It’s tomorrow’s problem that you don’t have to worry about yet.

        It’s not the easier solution, but it is the easier thought.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Your mom is the easiest thot. Sorry, it was right there, I had to take the opportunity.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Its not fundamentally flawed though. It just needs a few tweaks.