Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC' - eviltoast

You heard him 4090 users, upgrade to a more powerful GPU.

  • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still keeping track of lots of variables across a big play space at any time regardless of NPC schedules.

    They tried that once with Oblivion and clearly it didn’t add enough to the game and players experience to return to.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They tried that once with Oblivion

      They advertised that with Oblivion’s AI but never delivered on half the claims.

      Go look at the pre-release claims of the Radiant AI and what was actually delivered.

    • peppersky@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      “keeping track of lots of variables” doesn’t cost CPU time though, since nothing that isn’t on the same map as you is ever relevant for anything. Their engine just fucking sucks.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Keeping track of variables doesn’t use CPU time? Ok man. I’m all for hating on Bethesda’s shitty engine but that’s just not true. At the very least it does track what NPCs are doing off screen which is how they end up at your ship when you tell them to go there. They will actually walk to your ship if you don’t get there first.

        On the other hand it’s basically guaranteed that Bethesda spent zero effort optimizing that. I bet it’s the same code they ran for Skyrim.