Bethesda says most of Starfield's 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because 'when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there' but 'they certainly weren't bored' - eviltoast

Sure Todd, lol

  • Yepthatsme@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have no clue what people are talking about? I have beaten it twice and surveyed an entire solar system and there was plenty. You can fly around to any point in most planets and moons and have stuff generate at each landing, within hiking distance.

    I feel like the game is so big and good, the haters are just hating and being stupidly immature about it.

    • vitriolix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think here we are reacting to the colossally dumb reasoning in the quote from the article. Astronauts had a few things to be excited about that gamers… won’t

    • CraigeryTheKid@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Beaten it twice? like the main story? Honestly I forgot Skyrim had a story too. I always wandered for so long I forgot what I was doing.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything in the game is “within hiking distance” because that’s how the game generates planets. You don’t just “land on a planet”. You go through several hidden loading screens and arrive in a 1km x 1km square of planet.

    • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ng+2 ? Any more change at +2 over +1, apart from the item & ship? Does the suit even improve ? And the ship ?A good mantis still is better I found