Carmakers are failing the privacy test. Owners have little or no control over data collected - eviltoast
  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    OnStar has been a thing in vehicles from several automakers since 1996. Do not assume. Do some research and be sure.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah, ok, then I’m good with my '03 Volvo. It’s a GM remote diagnostic software bundle. No remote and no GM… That’s useful.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just don’t want people to have a false sense of security just because their cars are older.

        • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my case I’m pretty sure it’s a safe car in that respect. No remote communication module in the car and the dealer has no access to the software as well. I do my own maintenance and have been doing it for 5 years. The only camera that’s in it is the dashcam I fitted. No drivers assist that requires camera’s, no adaptive cruise control, not even a reverse camera for parking, just sensors. I’ve got no clue how it is with the next generation though.

          Weirdest thing on this point is that my employer doesn’t want camera’s on the terrain around the buildings, but loads of contractors with Teslas can just park where they want…

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      that thing literally forgets what time it is when i diconnect the battery, i don’t think it’s connecting to any servers. plus it was 10.000€, there’s no way it had that feature.