Zuckerberg: The AI Slop Will Continue Until Morale Improves - eviltoast

In a quarterly earnings call that was overwhelmingly about AI and Meta’s plans for it, Zuckerberg said that new, AI-generated feeds are likely to come to Facebook and other Meta platforms. Zuckerberg said he is excited for the “opportunity for AI to help people create content that just makes people’s feed experiences better.” Zuckerberg’s comments were first reported by Fortune.

“I think we’re going to add a whole new category of content, which is AI generated or AI summarized content or kind of existing content pulled together by AI in some way,” he said. “And I think that that’s going to be just very exciting for the—for Facebook and Instagram and maybe Threads or other kind of Feed experiences over time.”

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    Every change and addition made to Facebook since it first started has been for the worse. This manchild is a monster who’s irresponsibility has literally caused genocides in Africa.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I learned today that every AI prompt uses about 16 ounces of clean water. It was really depressing.

    • pup_atlas@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It doesn’t use water in the sense that it is consuming it. It “uses” water in the sense that it is temporarily in a datacenter, gets a little hot, and then leaves the datacenter. I don’t even think a lot of datacenters use actual drinking water, instead taking water directly from a river, warming it slightly, and putting it back in said river.

      Not to say I like AI, or think it’s a good thing. But this phrase that’s been going around just bugs me, because it’s really misleading. We should be focused on the ridiculous amount of energy it consumes, not the water it temporarily uses.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        From what I learned the problem is they don’t put it back in the river, it’s just in the coolant systems and stays there. And they won’t disclose how much they are actually using.

        • pup_atlas@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well it has to go somewhere, you can’t just take in water forever with nowhere for it to go. So either it’s non-potable water being returned to its source, or it’s closed loop. In either case, it’s not really a problem.

        • cowpattycrusader@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          There are two types of cooling systems: Closed Loop and Once Through.

          This response consumed 16 oz of water but I am not sure in which manner.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I setup 2FA on Facebook using one of those USB keys ages ago. I tried to login again recently but it tells me to use an authenticator app which I never configured, and when I try to use the USB key it blinks at me. I know the key works because I use it for other things. When I looked into logging in somehow else it brought up some crazy page telling me I’d have to send my license to Facebook or some such shit. Oh well, guess it’s a dead profile now.

  • spector@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The goal has always been engagement prisons. Where people never leave the platform. With generated content this must seem like a final step. They don’t need to make people to interact with each other in ways that keeps both of them engaged. They don’t need to leech content from other sites while preventing people from going to the site. With generated content people will interact with themselves while engaged in completely fabricated content. It’s even more dystopian than ever.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think I’m with him on this one. Replacing all the people on social with AI agents would give us back so much free time! And we could even restart socializing for real.

    Go on Zuckerberg, give us a Facebook made only of AI agents creating fake pictures of inexistent gatherings and posting them, so other AIs can recommend them and million of other AIs can comment on them!

    You are an unsung hero, Zuckerberg, but one day they’ll understand and thank you

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Genuinely curious how long you could continue getting people to sink advertising dollars into the bot playground. If he played it smart I bet he could get a solid decade or so of people paying to show ads to AIs without telling them all the people are gone. Maybe longer, if he’s really smart and actually tells them for real that there’s no people in there but that their marketing materials will be incorporated into the AI in/output.

  • homoludens@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    a whole new category of content, which is AI generated or AI summarized content or kind of existing content pulled together by AI in some way,

    Good to know that they really have thought it through. Reminds me of the kind of user story our project manager writes.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Keep in mind that in quarterly financial statements, any forward-looking promises made are pretty much legally binding so CEOs never give specifics.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This man is a Muppet. He just wants to exploit the people who live in this world and use his services for profits. What a legacy to leave behind…

    He won’t get me. I deleted Facebook over a decade ago. The writing was all over the walls, everyone…

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I know that’s probably a generic insult, but he kinda does look like beaker from the Muppets.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Am i mistaken or did he regress to a typical CEO type, from the way he can’t put together one single sentence without stumbling over another one?

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Statements made in quarterly financial calls are a very particular level of legally binding, so CEOs sound like that because they are terrified of making promises that won’t be kept.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The metaverse a resounding failure, Facebook has latched on to the AI hype train in hopes of making the company relevant. They’re basically put of ideas on how to feed the beast of “forever growth” the markets demand.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      They have a slim chance if they keep subsidizing VR headsets to hold a and luceative chunk of the VR market when that actually takes off. VR is genuinely cool enough that enough people will get hooked once they experience a headset on their face with a VR experience that jives with them

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’ve played VR before. But I don’t see it as a necessity just to play video games. It’s also incredibly disorienting after playing for a while, and it’s expensive to get the VR headsets, usually, also requiring you to already have a console, or PC to hook up to, so why wouldn’t we just play regular games then?

        • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          VR is great when playing Warthunder in aircraft, where you can easily track an opponents plane while maneuvering your aircraft after them.

          For tank and naval battles - meh.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          24 hours ago

          All of the things you listed are either being worked on, or are mischaracterizations of the state of VR.

          • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            23 hours ago

            While I do agree, I also find that even though I find VR a lot more intense and enjoyable than any flat screen game I’ve played, I also only rarely use mine even still. There’s something about it that seems to make it a hassle to use casually somehow, between actually getting the headset straps feeling comfortable, getting the passthrough cables plugged, launching driver programs on both the pc and the headset just to get to steamvr. It’s not a problem at all if I’m feeling specifically like doing VR stuff for a couple hours as it doesn’t take that long, but if I’m recently home from work and want to just chill for a bit without really knowing what, even that inconvenience means that the VR stuff basically never gets used for me.

            My current VR headset feels a lot more polished than my previous, older one, or previous experience with earlier devices owned by people I was visiting, and admittedly I bet it’s probably a bit smoother on standalone than on pc passthrough like I go for, but I feel like to really take off, putting it on is going to need to not feel like setting up a printer whilst wearing a box on your head.

          • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I’m just not sold on it. I can play the same games without VR, and they work just fine for me. I think most people feel the same way.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Funny, the first thing I do when I recognize that something is AI-generated media, I make an effort never to visit that site/channel/feed/whatever ever again.