Typing monkey would be unable to produce 'Hamlet' within the lifetime of the universe, study finds - eviltoast

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

  • Klear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Humans are apes, apes are monkeys, paraphyletic groups are bullshit.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be entirely fair, apes aren’t monkeys. I don’t think that particular distinction is really all that relevant to the discussion, but technically…

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        From wikipedia:

        Traditionally, all animals in the group now known as simians are counted as monkeys except the apes. Thus monkeys, in that sense, constitute an incomplete paraphyletic grouping; however, in the broader sense based on cladistics, apes (Hominoidea) are also included, making the terms monkeys and simians synonyms in regard to their scope.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh neat. This is all taxonomy that is well beyond me. My defense of calling humans monkeys is that everyone does it, and that’s how language works. Glad to know I’m correct too, technically lol