TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldM to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agoHegellemmy.worldimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1151arrow-down110
arrow-up1141arrow-down1imageHegellemmy.worldTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldM to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoPhilosophy is not a science.
minus-squareJuice@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoInvalidating anything that might conflict with your favorite epistemology? Certainly there’s no problem here, as long as you avoid philosophy
minus-squareJuice@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoThe “rational enlightenment” and its consequences
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 months agoAnd yet Philosophy of Science exists.
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoThat’s just more philosophy.
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoPhilosopher aggrandizes philosophy. Film at 11. Bioethics isn’t a science either.
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 months agoEconomics isn’t a science either, but for some strange reason it persists.
Philosophy is not a science.
Invalidating anything that might conflict with your favorite epistemology? Certainly there’s no problem here, as long as you avoid philosophy
No.
The “rational enlightenment” and its consequences
And yet Philosophy of Science exists.
That’s just more philosophy.
Crazy ain’t it.
Philosopher aggrandizes philosophy. Film at 11.
Bioethics isn’t a science either.
Economics isn’t a science either, but for some strange reason it persists.