Row as Starmer suggests landlords and shareholders are not ‘working people’ - eviltoast
  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    That’s not what Keir said originally, he said people who own any stock should be excluded from “working people”. Then people got (rightfully) mad and his spokesperson had to recant for him.

    • davidagain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Why are you so cross about this? He only means that he’ll tax their unearned income a bit more, and if they really are working people out won’t affect them much.

      The extent to which it affects workers is the extent to which they aren’t workers. It isn’t the logical gotcha you seem to think it is.

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Why am I so cross? Because I am stripped my working people status by Starmer despite me working all my adult life and still can’t start buying a house, for putting a bit of my savings into stock, just so he can claim he “didn’t raise working people’s taxes”.

        That’s just peak slimey politician behaviour.

        Do I think people who own a lot of stocks and assets should be taxed. Hell yes, let’s tax those motherfuckers. But just don’t lie and stop twisting the definition of working people.

        Edit: typo

        • davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          So sorry, there’s a typo in your second sentence and I can’t figure out what you meant to say.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      No he did not.

      He said people who own any stock should be excluded from “working taxes"

      More accurately, he said they do not fit his definition of working taxes. Because that was the question the telegraph was trying to miss represent.

      As does the Tory party and every government since the 1950s. That is why we have capital gains tax as well as income tax.

      This whole argument is nothing but absurdly biased reporting from right wing press. Intentionally launched to try and sow division in the electorate. Just like every Tory tactic since the election was announced.