Mazda's New "Pay-Per-Honk" Plan Leaves Drivers Speechless - eviltoast
  • Zoot@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Disagree. Horns are the only way of letting people you are there. Why the hell should I need to pay to honk? You want to be forced to pay to honk when some dude tries Tboning you because they didn’t stop at a stop sign?

    • caesaravgvstvs@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because, more often than not it’s used abusively and not for the actual purpose.

      Plus it’s a polluting loud noise that puts the onus of recognizing the danger of the vehicle on someone outside of it

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not sure where you live, but I’ve avoided numerous accidents thanks to being able to give a light honk and remind people to pay attention.

        If a car made me pay to honk, id probably just use the money to get a train horn.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Braking is great, if you have 100+feet to brake, depending on where and how it happened, sure!

            For the very few times I need a horn, I NEED a horn.

            Also again, not sure where you live, but it feels like I’m the only person who uses my horn in my state, which is likely why its so damn effective.

          • juliebean@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            braking and honking do not always apply to the same situations. both are necessary safety features that should absolutely not cost extra.