The Vote Socialist campaign stands unequivocally with the Palestinian people as they stand strong in the face of one year of US-Israeli genocide in Gaza. - eviltoast

For decades, we have been in the streets in defense of the Palestinian people, and will continue to fight until the total liberation of Palestine!

  • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just be wary of anyone conflating a simple vote for a 3rd party candidate for president every 4 years with the hard work of actually organizing a socialist movement. They are very different things. A 3rd party that has zero mathematical chance of success and crawls out of the woodwork every 4 years is a spoiler, not serious, and only benefits the fascist. This is just accelerationism.

    • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      PSL does plenty of organizing. They’re clearly one of the better socialist orgs in the US.

      Also that’s not what accelerationism means

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is that why PSL has a grand total of zero members in office? I thought surely there must be a few, but nope - zero. It’s literally a joke to run a candidate for president when you don’t have a single member serving in any elected office in the entire country. It’s laughable.

        And sure, maybe it’s not “true accelerationism” but it’s a common term to describe leftists that embrace people like Trump because they are deluded into thinking it will somehow break the system and a communist utopia can magically rise from the ashes. Call it whatever you want, but it will never be a good idea.

        • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not “embracing Trump”, that’s what liberals like to frame it as for rhetorical effect. Calling it accelerationism is just willful ignorance towards what the intentions of the approach are. It’s a strategy oriented around timescale that is more than just this election (in stark contrast to the alarmist “Most important election of our lifetime” rhetoric of liberals) because there will be more elections and unconditional subservience to the dems in this election will encourage their lurching still further to the right in future elections.

          The purpose is to make the Democrats choose between concessions to the left or letting the Republicans win. It’s not difficult to understand.

          • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Nobody said it was difficult to understand. I agree it’s a dead simple idea, and like most dead simple ideas it’s not actually a good idea. There’s a reason Bernie Sanders wholeheartedly endorsed Kamala (and Hillary), but sure, all the .ml folks must know better. If you think Bernie is too centrist then you need to understand that your cohort is so laughably out of step with the populace that you’ll never get anywhere. Kind of like where PSL is at with zero seats (ever, btw, not just currently).

            Real people will be harmed by another Trump term. Immigrants, women, POC, LGBT, basically anyone other than healthy white men. It says a lot when you think they’re all disposable enough to help Trump to win in the hopes of a future socialist movement that won’t ever happen because the movement can’t even win a single seat anywhere in the country. AOC correctly called the green party “not serious” and they’ve actually won a small handful of elections, unlike PSL. Movements start from the bottom up, not the top down.