The value of x - eviltoast
  • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    …what? I get that this drawing is very dysfunctional, but are you going to argue that a triangle within a plane can have a sum of angles of 190°?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope I’m not saying that. I’m saying this is a gotcha question that demotivates learners.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I see. I agree completely. The only place this belongs is as a thought experiment on making assumptions in geometry.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, I believe I implied this by suggesting that the sum of angles being 190° is absurd.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they’re saying that unless you’re already good at this stuff, it’s easy to assume that a visually 90° angle is actually 90° even when it’s not

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Especially if you are bad at this stuff you know that drawing anything like that accurately is a real pain and nobody who can avoid it will ever do it to represent anything accurately. That is what labels are for.