Mozilla explains their recent foray into advertising - A free and open internet shouldn’t come at the expense of privacy - eviltoast

MARK SURMAN, PRESIDENT, MOZILLA Keeping the internet, and the content that makes it a vital and vibrant part of our global society, free and accessible has

  • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Having enough political power to exert control over an industry is monopoly control in my book. Not yours?

    Theres a massive difference between advocating for something bu havinf some power and influence, and doing so with the power of a monopoly. You took my words and dialed them up to assume monopoly when all I meant is having a seat at the table.

    While you repeatedly insist (without basis) that services must use ads to exist, let me remind you: you are on Lemmy.

    Obviously not all services require ads to exist. Ive not stated that once, but you apparently are happy to put those words in my mouth to suit your arguments.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Let’s say there’s a table, and sitting at it are nine companies that want to wring every penny out of consumers by any means necessary. Mozilla sits at the table.

      How many horrid companies are there at the table now?

      Theres a massive difference between advocating for something bu havinf some power and influence, and doing so with the power of a monopoly.

      And what a table it is.

      • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        9 horrid plus 1 delusional that may swing toward horrid later for its own survival

        I mean, good luck but I doubt anything really changes. I hope to be wrong I just don’t expect to be - less disappointing that way.