Microsoft Edge gets "unfair advantage", browser makers claim - eviltoast

Some of the top browser makers around have issued a letter to the European Commission (EC) alleging that Microsoft gives the Edge browser an unfair advantage and should be subject to EU tech rules.

A letter seen by Reuters, sent by Vivaldi, Waterfox, and Wavebox, and supported by a group of web developers, also supports Opera’s move to take the EC to court over its decision to exclude Microsoft Edge from being subject to the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

As Edge comes pre-installed by default on Windows machines, users must navigate the Microsoft offering in order to download their browser of choice. The letter states that, “No platform independent browser can aspire to match Edge’s unparalleled distribution advantage on Windows. Edge is, moreover, the most important gateway for consumers to download an independent browser on Windows PCs.”

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yes, and its a nasty story thats all unofficial cause no one is ever gonna go on the record, at least not for another 10-20 years when it comes out in someones book…

        but the short of it is, Edge had its own browser engine, but google kept making changes to youtube and other google sites that broke Edges performance and made it run like dogshit, while leaving chromium based browsers alone.

        after many instances of sabotage > microsoft workaround > google sabotage> microsoft workaround. Microsoft finally gave up and remade Edge as a chromium based browser.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So Google establishing a now industry standard of evergreen versioning so that they could iterate relatively quickly on features, rather than have to maintain compatibility with years old versions, and iterating quickly on their own major websites - is a bad thing?

          Right.

          Yeah, let’s go back to having to maintain terrible legacy browsers that behaved completely differently for the rest of time.

          Edit - rofl. Bunch of revisionists here on Lemmy.

          https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share#monthly-201001-202409

          EdgeHtml released 2015.

          But sure, Google has been doing shitty things lately so let’s retroactively change history and make Microsoft the browser hero? Right.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            ah yes, the google white knights. here to completely misconstrue the argument to make everyone but google the bad guy.

            because thats what a trillion dollar company that threatens to seize control of the internet needs.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Rofl. So let’s white wash the browser history before chrome, then. Back when IE reigned supreme. You must either be too young or not in the industry to champion that.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Dude. Seriously. Genuinely.

                Are you on drugs?

                Or are you the victim of a mental derangement?

                Because we need an explanation for this complete divorce from reality you seem to be suffering from.

          • h4lf8yte@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            On “features” they would like to see. Most of the time features that make it difficult to block tracking and keep their advertising business going. The web is all about communication standards between different programs and this includes the joint adoption of new standards and respect for the existing standards.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              And Google established a lot of the standards that were both open and long living.

              Yeah, Google has strayed far from the “Do no evil” philosophy in the last decade. But this rewriting of history to praise IE and demonfy Chrome from that era is ridiculous.

                • Wrench@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Because we should wipe away 2 decades of history and pretend the next thing is flawless on release?

                  Edge came in with a freight train of baggage, and didn’t make it. It’s absurd to frame this otherwise.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s possible to go after both. M$ has some fucked up practices that trick the user into using edge that shouldn’t be okay

      • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I went to the widgets pane on my w11 laptop once, clicked an article and to my horror, all of my data had been synced from chrome to edge, including passwords, history, open tabs, extensions, pretty much everything.

        I even went as far as to report it to the ACCC (the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) since I’ve never seen it from other browsers, and that I found it pervy the fact they did it without consent, although I doubt the ACCC would be enough to change this shitty practice, and others like it.

        They’re not even trying to trick the user anymore, they’re forcing them.

          • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I agree, that has happened with other windows devices I’ve used recently (both w10 and 11), although this was completely reset, no data other than a chrome sign-in and a few games, this had also been the first time I opened edge, so I’m pretty confused how an opt in feature just magically stops requiring consent from the user…

      • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s possible to. Are they? Correct me if I’m wrong, but they’re not. They’re going after Microsoft and not Google.

        Not that it makes any difference since Edge is just reskinned Chrome now anyway. If it was still it’s own thing I’d be rooting for Microsoft, at least up until they start to become bigger, then I’d turn on them.

    • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Makes you wonder if these companies bringing the complaint are getting kickbacks from Google. Free search rank boosting for their respective companies comes to mind.