Had to read it 3 times to make sure - eviltoast
  • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t quite see the point they’re making, I’m assuming by “massive arbitration lawsuit” they mean they’re being sued because of and to get rid of the arbitration clause?

    I don’t see how it’s a win for them in either case tbh, maybe they’re trying to avoid having a precedent set is all that I can think of