Russia: Under a proposed new legislation, comments defending the decision not to have children could be fined by up to €50,000 - eviltoast

Archived link

Openly defending one’s decision not to have children will be prosecuted in Russia. The State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, is preparing a bill under which authorities will impose fines of up to €50,000 ($55,580) for supporting “the refusal to have children.” The measure affects all areas of life — from casual conversation to films and books — and is a serious threat to the Russian feminist movement.

The crackdown on what the Kremlin calls the “childfree” movement will result in fines of up to 400,000 rubles for individuals (around $4,300), 800,000 rubles for civil servants ($8,600), and up to five million rubles ($55,580) for companies or other legal entities. Foreigners will also be deported.

There are thousands of reasons why a person may decide not to have children, but the Cabinet of ministers has asked the State Duma to make only three exceptions to the law: religious reasons, medical reasons or in the case of rape. It also alleges that there is a mass-organized childfree movement, even though the websites on this subject are little more than a curiosity; Russian newspapers cite the existence of groups on VKontakte, the Russian Facebook, which barely have 5,000 members.

[…]

  • hamburgheftig@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It also helps not being a hellhole of dictatorship. I know so many younger people with russian origins here in Germany, who (or whose parents) might have stayed in Russia if it wasn’t a bloody dictatorship. More babies are not helping if everybody who can is fleeing the country at the first opportunity

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Very good point! I just wanted to point out the stupidity of even remotely implying other countries don’t try to tackle this issue in MUCH better ways.

      I’d even argue that shutting down speech is specifically not “trying to solve” it. At all. It’s literally deciding to not talk about it. Few problems get better when they cannot even be freely discussed…