Ubisoft comes crawlin' back to Steam - eviltoast
  • moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think part of the Steam contract for publishers is that they can’t sell their games cheaper elsewhere. So anyone wanting to compete with Steam on price needs to sell games that are in demand but not already on Steam. And Epic is really the only company with the pull to get that to happen, but the only way for them to do it is to get exclusivity, which gamers hate.

    • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      From my understanding, thats only for selling Steam Keys. As long as you’re not using Steam’s infrastructure, you’re fine. You often can find better prices off Steam as it is, on platforns like Epic, GOG or esspecially Itch.io.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I thought it was the opposite, that they can’t sell lower on other marketplaces, but they can do what they want with their keys.

        • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Information is limitted as the contracts used for developers aren’t shared, but the general understanding is that this only applies to Steam keys.

          The one exception is the wolfire games lawsuit, which includes one alleged instance of Valve asking a developer not to distribute the game for free on their Discord when it is a paid product on Steam. Given the lack of detail, the single anecdote for evidence, the existence of other games where they are priced lower or free off Steam (I.E. Dwarf Fortress), its certainly not a widespread problem, almost certainly not in contract, if it did happen exactly as the anecdote suggests, may have been a misstep on the part of one employee, and may not have happened at all.

          Of course, if Valve does do this, nonetheless mandated it, its an issue, but given that no one else has challenged them on what would be such a blatent anti-trust case, esspecially given how everyone else in the industry has been trying to take Valve’s place for years, I think its unlikely.