Manchin not endorsing Harris after she backed ending filibuster to codify abortion rights - eviltoast
  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    Republicans can endorse Harris all day long and I’m here for it.

    Manchin endorsing Harris would have actually done her a disservice.

      • Pegajace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not even. He officially left the Dems and registered as independent earlier this year.

            • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 minutes ago

              Fetterman is bad on Israel-Palestine but I thought he was otherwise ok re: democracy, women’s rights, etc? Am I wrong? He’s not my rep so I’m actually asking.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Gabbard and Sinema are people that can be replaced with other democrats, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking a more progressive person would likely get elected for Manchin’s West Virginia seat.

            Manchin may suck, but he caucuses with the dems and puts the dems 2 seats over the majority line. Which means his existence currently allows the Chuck Schumer to replace Mitch McConnell, which means the dems control what comes to the floor in the senate.

            • Billiam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 minutes ago

              On the one hand, this matters because it allows the Senate to actually approve qualified judges to the federal bench, instead of the insane ideologues the GOP puts there.

              On the other hand, all the federal judges in the world mean very little when SCOTUS is as thoroughly corrupt and extreme-right as it is, and has no issue overturning whatever cases they want to achieve the decision they’ve already arrived at.

              On the other other hand, Manchin got to obstruct otherwise-popular legislation from either passing, or even being brought up for a vote merely by threatening to vote against it.

              On the whole we’re definitely better than we were before Biden took office, but I wouldn’t put too much emphasis on Manchin. The successes of the Biden administration are despite Manchin, not because of him.

            • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              They just can’t pass anything. But yeah, it is still better than what the other side would bring to the floor.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The fact that Biden called for this exact same thing and Manchin was ok endorsing him but has to make a big scene when a non-white woman calls for doing the same thing basically tells you everything you need to know about Manchin

    • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I think there are more differences between Kamala and Joe besides melanin levels and genitalia structure but okay I guess

      Edit: Oh, I guess Kamala really is Biden in an Indian-African-American woman’s body after all, nvm

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why not just make the filibuster what it used to be and require the people who want to wield it to hold the floor for hours upon hours with no break? Some of it was silly. Some of it heroic. Either way, it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs and, thus, was used much less often.

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      This seems like such a fair way to add some discomfort to filibustering and making it a bit less appealing.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      it required someone to truly be willing to stand behind their beliefs

      Conservatives don’t typically have these, and the ones that do know how unpopular they are. That’s why they fight against any attempt to reign it in.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Manchin was not going to endorse her anyway.

    It’s 42 days to the election, people are voting, if he was going to endorse her it would have been at the convention.

  • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’d seen the quote, but not the withholding of endorsement. Well, I guess he’s going to join the ‘both sides bad’ crowd.

    Still. What does his opinion matter? He’s leaving the Senate next year so his proper alt-Right replacement can take over…

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Fuck Joe “This is the best we can hope for” Manchin.

    And fuck the system that makes him the best we can hope for.

    West Virginia used to be cool.

  • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Holy Grail? An item given no special meaning in the Bible, and was blown out of proportion in importance by fiction writers a thousand years later? I guess Manchin doesn’t really think the filibuster is too important then.