What question that you've never seen anyone else ask before interests you the most? - eviltoast
  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Your commitment to this fantasy in your head is rather impressive, even if it is really sad.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, I keep bringing up the thing I originally commented, while you keep pretending to be very serious and all, then leaving these utterly childish replies, where like I’ve said a dozen times, you can’t even address the things you yourself say.

      So who exactly isn’t answering questions?

      A bit ashamed you were wrong? It’s okay. It’s the internet. It’s full of people like you saying dumb shit they can’t back up and get flustered about. There’s nothing to be ashamed of.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        A bit ashamed you were wrong? It’s okay. It’s the internet. It’s full of people like you saying dumb shit they can’t back up and get flustered about. There’s nothing to be ashamed of.

        I know it is hard, because I cannot find it in me to listen to you, but you should at least listen to yourself. ;)

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you’re admitting that you don’t “listen” to the people you have conversations with online?

          This is looking better and better for you, isn’t it? You ask for books, then can’t talk about them, you yell “fallacy” then say you’re not debating, you say you won’t even reply anymore, but then keep coming back, despite not having anything to say except these childish attempts at being a smart-arse.

          Why do you do it?

          I can address everything we’ve talked about. I can stand behind my words. You can’t.

          You need to “up your game”.

          • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Go ahead and stand by your words anytime you are ready. Feel free to copy paste my questions, and put the relevant rant that “answers” any one of them below the quoted question. If you can answer all four with what you have previously written in your comments I will go back and answer every single sentence you ended with a “?”.

            Otherwise, I will just keep doing what I am doing. Which is showing this thread to my spouse, and anyone who finds chronically online nut jobs humorous, and laughing at you until we all get bored and move on with life.

            On that note, there is a lot of hope that you will continue responding as we are drinking now and having a great time. If you do not mind continuing with whatever it is you are doing that would be greatly appreciated by approximately 5 people.

            Cheers!

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s so easy to provoke you. All I need to do is to quote you back to yourself and you’ll get red in the face.

              Again, you can’t address anything you’ve said, or that I’ve said.

              “Feel free to copy paste” You mean “copypaste”, btw. This is the extremes you’ll go to. You just have to reply, but you can’t address anything we’ve talked about, and now literally pretend like it’s impossible for you to look at my answers, when you just wrote that “anyone can read the thread.” Why don’t you start by actually reading it yourself, hmm? It’s funny that a person who can’t even write words correctly asked me about punctuation. Hue hue hue. Like I’ve said before, you’re so pretentious it literally twists my stomach to an extent.

              It is funny that you think I am debating you, or that I owe you an answer to any of your questions when you refuse to answer mine.

              I began this thread. I made a comment. You took it as some official claim, but even got it wrong on what the claim was. You then asked for the literature I had offered to show. Which I did. Then you refused to address it, then you started yelling something about “fallacy”, (which once again is kinda funny, because it shows how you larp a philosopher/debater while not knowing what the ‘argument from fallacy’ is), then you started going totally off the rails with these childish comments. Even then, I kept replying to you. I answered your childish strawmen several times. I’ve responded with literature, but you literally can not even name the book I’ve given you, let alone actually discuss what’s in it (because it would require actually reading the book), nor even discuss the subject of the book. Because you’ve realised you’re wrong, and you’re just such a small person that even on a pseudonymous board, you get a panic attack when you think about publicly admitting to having said something stupid. I’ve addressed all your childish garbage, and you can’t address anything you’ve said or what I’ve said. It’s downright pitiful, honestly. I wish better for you.

              You keep moving your goalposts.

              I haven’t changed what I’m saying, at any point. I’ve answered you several times. If you can’t read the thread, that’s really not my issue, is it? Perhaps you need to… up your game? ;)

              • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You keep moving your goalposts.

                The goal post was to answer the questions posed. You still haven’t and the posts haven’t moved.

                It’s so easy to provoke you. All I need to do is to quote you back to yourself and you’ll get red in the face.

                I think you may have reached a point beyond projection, in a realm known as total delusion. The only one provoked here is obviously you. Easily verified by you putting everything “important” in bold(pretentious much?), attacking anyone who responds to you, all while pretending you are some enlightened individual who just has to be listened to for the good of man kind.

                Sorry to burst your bubble but you aren’t special, intelligent, or worth listening to. Which is why I continue to ignore what you are saying. Which I explicitly told you I was going to do.

                I do have to give you some credit though. The fact you have kept this going for almost a week is rather impressive. Sad, but impressive.

                I cannot wait for the next mess of a comment you decide to post!

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You still can’t address anything you’ve said in the thread.

                  To quote you;

                  It is funny that you think I am debating you, or that I owe you an answer to any of your questions when you refuse to answer mine.

                  And

                  No, I don’t agree that the prohibition of all drugs has to be lifted for the good of society

                  You’re wrong. You’re plain wrong. The science shows this. You can’t address this. You’ll chew of your own leg before trying to debate me on this, because you realise you got into a debate with someone who knows his shit, while you’re full of shit, and you’re absolutely terrified of being ashamed “publicly.” Too late buddy. Sorry. :(

                  All you can do is repeat your childish ad hom. Nothing else. I’ll quote you a bit more, but you won’t be able to address that either.

                  Oh look more logical fallacy with a heavy sprinkle of personal attack

                  And the earlier “you think I am debating you” combined with this gives a really nice taste of irony, doesn’t it? ;)

                  You can’t stand behind those words either, because you’re now extremely ashamed when I pointed out how childish it is to pretend to know how rhetoric works by thinking that yelling out “logical fallacy” means the other person’s rhetoric can be dismissed. If you had ever read a book about rhetoric, you’d know that. But, of course you haven’t. You don’t read books. You just google the names of books. :D

                  ONE MORE QUOTE (which you won’t be able to address):

                  Honestly the logical fallacy and personal attacks have become quite tiresome. You are not worth any further time

                  Curious how you’re still here, so upset, while loudly proclaiming I’m not “worth any further time”. Almost as if I’ve provoked you, isn’t it? ;)

                  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I stand by everything I have said. Made clear by the lack of editing done.

                    Maybe stop quoting me out of context. You may understand why you are wrong.