Twenty percent of hard drives used for long-term music storage in the 90s have failed - eviltoast

Hard drives from the last 20 years are now slowly dying.

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    NAS is another option instead of relying on random assortment of drives.

    But it’s most cost-effective to use cold storage like Backblaze if you don’t need to access that data and just want to archive it.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      What I meant by drives are NAS. I buy the drives on sale spin up a new array, migrate the data, and redirect the mount point.

      I use to cold store until I realized that unless I have access to it, it might as well not exist. Now I keep everything live, even backups going back to 1997.

      The only data I have “lost” are copies of my old warez CDs from eastern Europe because I have no idea where I have stashed them, and a pack of Zip Disks because I have no functioning Zip Drive.

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Phew, I was imagining a closet of drives. NAS is great.

        Cold storage is always controversial as you are storing it on someone else’s hardware, but it is by far the most cost-effective option. Just a single month’s electricity cost in some places can match years of cold storage.

        Using both of course is recommended, as cold storage acts as another backup vector in case your own storage ever gets catastrophic failure due to fire or flooding. 3-2-1 rule and all. But cost is always a factor in people using the best practices.