Starfield review controversy traces game journalism's orbital decay - eviltoast

More concerning than Bethesda’s decision to withhold early review codes from certain outlets is how heavily some sites are relying on the game to drive their business.

  • Mkengine@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Exactly, it feels like 50/100 is the baseline and 75/100 is mediocre. 75/100 tells me I have to be a fan of the genre to enjoy it. This rating inflation really shows how dependent reviewers are. This is one of the reasons I like organisations like Stiftung Warentest instead of depending on some biased product comparison blogs.

    • Stormyfemme@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You may notice that this parallels the american school grading system to a T. Most major gaming review sites and such are done by americans that spent anywhere between 4-10+ years with that being the what grading/reviewing/scoring was done in almost every interaction they ever had past childhood, there’s no wonder it’s the standard here even if it’s changed the scoring paradigm.

      • Pigeon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly this. 50/100 looks like an F, because that’s what it would be on a school paper. Often we’d even be given points out of a hundred just like that. So giving a 50 to a middling/okay game feels really harsh, vs 70 (aka a C) or 80 (B).