A study found that there is a significant decline of the nutrient content in 43 different crops between 1950 and 1999 - eviltoast
  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    But it does boil down to business pressures. The business prefers more and bigger produce to more nutritional produce.

    Is that a bad thing? Maybe not. Maybe you can just eat more to get your nutrition since higher yield should reduce cost.

    But the point still stands that there is very little business pressure to make a nutritious product.

    • Jayjader@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my ideal world, the population would be sufficiently educated about nutrition in fruit and vegetables that picture-perfect tomatoes that are picked unripe so that they survive long distance hauling would simply never sell.

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even then how you you know? I don’t think anyone can reliably look at a vegetable and tell you how nutritious it is. I don’t think it is reasonable to have the general population being experts in evaluating vegetables.

        I think what could work here is mandated labeling. This is required for most foods but generally not produce. I think there are some reasonable reasons for this, but for farms producing huge volumes it seems that occasional testing that gets reported at the store would make sense.