Anyone having acceptable performance with SQL Server + odbc? - eviltoast

Omg it’s sooo daammmn slooow it takes around 30 seconds to bulk - insert 15000 rows

Disabling indices doesn’t help. Database log is at SIMPLE. My table is 50 columns wide, and from what i understand the main reason is the stupid limit of 2100 parameters in query in ODBC driver. I am using the . NET SqlBulkCopy. I only open the connection + transaction once per ~15000 inserts

I have 50 millions rows to insert, it takes literally days, please send help, i can fucking write with a pen and paper faster than damned Microsoft driver inserts rows

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Looping single inserts over an open connection is far far slower than a bulk insert because every row is another transaction.

    Only thing it’s faster than is if you opened and closed a connection for each row.