The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 months agoSmoking PSAlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1910arrow-down133
arrow-up1877arrow-down1imageSmoking PSAlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareiheartneopets@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 months agoIs it just me, or does she look GINORMOUS compared to that child? He looks at least 3, but is the relative size of my 5 month old?
minus-squareMr_Blott@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoMaybe he’s a newborn but the smoking has aged him horribly
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIt may be child actor laws so they had to take a 2 or 3 year old and make them look as young as possible. Most babies in film are twins because they tend to be born earlier and thus look younger when they can first legally appear in a commercial film.
Is it just me, or does she look GINORMOUS compared to that child? He looks at least 3, but is the relative size of my 5 month old?
Maybe he’s a newborn but the smoking has aged him horribly
I see that too
It may be child actor laws so they had to take a 2 or 3 year old and make them look as young as possible.
Most babies in film are twins because they tend to be born earlier and thus look younger when they can first legally appear in a commercial film.