Asking gemini if google is a monopoly - eviltoast
  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeEnglish
    21·
    2 months ago

    I get the concerns about the reliability of LLM generated content, and it’s true that LLMs can produce errors because they don’t actually understand what they’re saying. But this isn’t an issue unique to LLMs. Humans also make mistakes, are biased, and get things wrong.

    The main point I’m trying to make is that dismissing information just because it came from an LLM is still an ad hominem fallacy. It’s rejecting the content based on the source, not the merits of the argument itself. Whether the information comes from a human or an LLM, it should be judged on its content, not dismissed out of hand. The standard should be the same for any source: evaluate the validity of the information based on evidence and reasoning, not just where it came from.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 months ago

      Ok, I get what you’re saying, but I really don’t know how to say this differently for the third time: that’s not what ad hominem means

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        It’s a form of ad hominem fallacy. That’s atleast how I see it. I don’t know a better way to describe it. I guess we’ll just got to agree to disagree on that one.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          2 months ago

          Ad hominem is when you attack the entity making a claim using something that’s not relevant to the claim itself. Pointing out that someone (general someone, not you) making a claim doesn’t have the right credentials to likely know enough about the subject, or doesn’t live in the area they’re talking about, or is an LLM, aren’t ad hominem, because those observations are relevant to the strength of their argument.

          I think the fallacy you’re looking for could best be described as an appeal to authority fallacy? But honestly I’m not entirely sure either. Anyways I think we covered everything… thanks for the debate :)

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        As a side note, I’d like to thank you for the polite, good-faith exchange. If more people adopted your conversational style, I’d definitely enjoy my time here a lot more.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          Ah, now I feel bad for getting a bit snippy there. You were polite and earnest as well. Thanks for the convo 🫡