riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 months agoyeahh gay sex rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1321arrow-down18 cross-posted to: abrosexual@lemmy.ca
arrow-up1313arrow-down1imageyeahh gay sex rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneriwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 months agomessage-square35fedilink cross-posted to: abrosexual@lemmy.ca
minus-squareNorah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agoPersonally, thanks to polygamy’s history and recency to current times, yes, I think being married to multiple people is a bad idea. I’m for keeping it illegal until we can be sure it won’t be used like that again. I don’t think now is that time.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoi really don’t like that reasoning, that sounds way to close to the reasoning used to make gay marriage illegal. Who are you to decide whether i get to marry the people i love?
minus-squareNorah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoAnd I don’t think it’s valid at all to compare the two. Polygamists were never “oppressed”, they were the ones doing the oppression (of their wives).
Personally, thanks to polygamy’s history and recency to current times, yes, I think being married to multiple people is a bad idea. I’m for keeping it illegal until we can be sure it won’t be used like that again. I don’t think now is that time.
i really don’t like that reasoning, that sounds way to close to the reasoning used to make gay marriage illegal.
Who are you to decide whether i get to marry the people i love?
And I don’t think it’s valid at all to compare the two. Polygamists were never “oppressed”, they were the ones doing the oppression (of their wives).