Why just blocking Meta's Threads won't be enough to protect your privacy once they join the fediverse - eviltoast
    • Hillock@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if you and the instance you are using is blocking Threads your information still becomes visible to Threads if someone on an instance that isn’t blocking Threads interacts with you. The interaction can come in the form of following, boosting, or mentioning your name.

      Then the fear, according of the article, is for hate groups going out of their way to harass vulnerable groups.

      • amio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And it’s worth mentioning that the article has specific cases of that happening already.

      • fuckyou_m8@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They don’t even need to go through a middle third party instance, they just have to have a ghost instance that nobody know it belongs to them and this one will federate with everybody else

        For example if you go to FMHY federated instances, there is one called evil.social , that could be from Meta or Google or NSA… nobody knows

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Threads has an influx of bad actors (right-extremist, anti-LGBT racists and any permutation) who intentionally target vulnerable groups on the FV.

      You can’t rely on individual blocks, including for the whole Threads “instance”. If Threads ends up in a federation, everything else on that federation is now compromised because that’s simply how public content works on AP. There’s no real way around this without keeping Threads out of federation.