TIL that Proctor & Gamble and Unilever actively sponsor Russian war efforts and are on the International Sponsors of War list. - eviltoast
  • halfelfhalfreindeer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Frankly that’s an excuse, and a lazy one at that. Ethical products are widely available outside of the US, and I say this as a digital nomad who has lived on three continents and lived in the US for less than a year in total. If the inconvenience is unbearable for you then that’s your prerogative, but don’t try to justify it by saying things that simply aren’t true and thereby discouraging others.

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can you provide some links so we have a starting point? Simply googling Ethical Shampoo is going to bring about a disheartening and probably half fake onslaught of results that would be nearly impossible to sort through.

    • Kerrigor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not everyone can afford such alternatives. It isn’t simply a matter of inconvenience, it’s a matter of access and expense.

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        also a crap excuse… P&G don’t make cheap products; they make brand name products… plenty of home brand stuff is cheap, and doesn’t actively support russias genocide

        there are other discussions to be had about environmental impact, pay gap, etc but that’s not what we’re discussing

        • Kerrigor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m referring to ones that are made by non-controversial companies. It’s difficult to find products that aren’t made by the same companies just under a different name. Finding ethical alternatives isn’t as simple as “don’t buy P&G”, and isn’t cheap either

          • PupBiru@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            there are (at least) 2 things that boycotts are meant to do:

            • directly deny funding to the company which will pass that onto “causes” you disagree with
            • make a statement that you and others disagree with decisions the company is making

            in the first point, switching to a different brand produced by the same company clearly does nothing unless the at product has a lower margin (which isn’t even unlikely either: plenty of brands do the “budget”, “midrange”, “luxury” brand concept and budget is where they make their least overhead)

            on the second however, that’s where you can maybe make a difference… if a company starts to see market share dip in their big name products, that’s problematic for them even if people are switching to other products in their line that are less well known, because it shows that people have more negative attitudes to their brands