BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoLLMs have a strong bias against use of African American Englisharstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down138cross-posted to: ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up153arrow-down1external-linkLLMs have a strong bias against use of African American Englisharstechnica.comBlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square57fedilinkcross-posted to: ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@beehaw.org
minus-square11111one11111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoIs this the new term for ebonics and is ebonics offensive now or inappropriate?
minus-squareTheRealKuni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoEssentially, yes. Ebonics isn’t inherently offensive or inappropriate, as far as I can tell, but it has connotations that are not attached to AAE. Linguists avoid the term today, and modern uses of it tend to be derogatory. Source
Is this the new term for ebonics and is ebonics offensive now or inappropriate?
Essentially, yes. Ebonics isn’t inherently offensive or inappropriate, as far as I can tell, but it has connotations that are not attached to AAE. Linguists avoid the term today, and modern uses of it tend to be derogatory.
Source