Under Meredith Whittaker, Signal Is Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong - eviltoast
  • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 个月前

    who needs to keep changing a chat program? IRC has been around since the 1980s or so and still works fine.

    some people like texting their family who doesn’t use IRC, and they’d rather not send messages in plain text for one reason or another.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 个月前

      I get that IRC is old school and encryption is important. My question is why the program has to keep changing. If the task is simple enough, there shouldn’t be incompatible changes required if there are new versions at all.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 个月前

        With new possibilities due to new tech user demands rise, too. People asked for features like group or video chats or coupled devices (not trivial with E2EE) and since good companies listen, they developed those and still do.

        Also, I don’t think there’s a single IRC client still in use that hasn’t been updated since the 80s. I wouldn’t be surprised if your favorite client got an update in the last couple of months - and that despite it being a trivial protocol.