U.S. Senate's McConnell freezes up for second time in public appearance - eviltoast
    • goo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No “please.” Just do. The People have spoken.

      • UnhingedFridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sane people have spoken. I’m sure way too many people would be willing to keep him in office even after this.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Could you explain your age limit issue? The man clearly has an age related medical problem, potentially dementia. And let’s also look at Dianne Feinstein.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve met 70+ yos that are perfectly capable of running large organizations, and with medicine getting better, we may see more older people that are still capable of governing.

          Instead of testing for age, we should test for mental acuity. I think both Biden and McConnell would fail that test, and probably more.

  • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t like the man’s politics, and I think it’s terrible that he’s been allowed to hold office this long with his deteriorating health.

    That said, I also find it so sad to see any person reaching a point where their cognitive abilities are this unpredictably impaired. Sudden freeze-ups and clear moments of detachment remind me too much of my father in-law and conversations I’ve had with him as his dementia develops.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree, aging is fucked up. My objection, not just about McConnell himself but elderly people in politics in general, is there’s this cool thing called retirement. It’s the perfect way to enjoy your older years. Perhaps he could have tried that before now.

      • Haus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone: You’re malfunctioning, please take a break from fucking people over.
        Turtle: Newp.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, people in KY like having a powerful member of the Senate be from their state and evidently he likes being a powerful member of the Senate.

  • pudcollar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That was a really satisfying video, in a morbid kind of staring at a car accident kind of way.

    • NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      You won’t see me shedding a tear for his failing mental health. He can retire at any time and I have no sympathy if he continues to press on in this condition.

  • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, he looks old in that video. It strikes me as kind of cruel that our political system so strongly incentivizes seniority, both for the young fresh politicians who’re just getting started and the career politicians who feel like they can’t retire because they need to justify dumping the best decades of their lives slowly shimmying up that totem-pole.

    FWIW: I do think that connections and experience really do matter for good governance, but no other industry pushes things this far. It’s messed up and it’s messing everything else up, too.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      IDK, I don’t think connections are that important, we should instead be reducing barriers to collaboration. If politicians had term limits, they’d need to figure out a different way of selecting leaders and getting information they need from other parts of government.

      The main benefit I see from longer term government workers is that they ought to know the law better, but at a certain point, they seem to learn more ways around it.

      • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel that’s a reasonable perspective to have and I’m receptive to it. My main thinking against it is that coercing collaboration is really hard at a systems level – I’m reminded of that one time Steve Jobs tried to make it so that the new Pixar building would have just one bathroom facility because he felt like that would lead to more people spontaneously bumping into each other.

        That’s just a flowery way of saying that I don’t have any fundamentally better ideas, though. Traditional political greases like trading favors & porkbarreling are something I’m willing to settle for so long as they don’t remain the exclusive domain of geriatrics. With that being said, I am by no means an expert and I’d love to hear more talk about alternatives

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My preferred approach is to break the two-party system, which can happen in a couple ways:

          • end FPTP voting - implement something like STAR or Approval voting instead
          • proportional representation in the House - i.e. no more House districts, your chosen party would instead get X seats based on percent of votes; who gets elected would be chosen by a primary vote (i.e. Approval voting statewide, top X get House seats)

          If no party has a majority, parties would be forced to form coalitions, which could lead to more collaboration instead of the constant push/pull we have now where parties often wait until they have control again so they don’t need to compromise.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Senator Mitch McConnell froze up for more than 30 seconds on Wednesday during a public appearance before he was escorted away, the second such incident in a little more than a month, a clip from an NBC News affiliate showed.

    McConnell, 81, was responding to questions from reporters after an event with the Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce in Covington when he froze up, staring into space and not responding to reporters and others nearby.

    After being approached by a second person, McConnell began talking again but needed reporters’ questions repeated to him by an aide and gave minimal answer in response.

    Representatives for McConnell were not immediately available for comment.

    The incident was eerily similar to one that took place in the Senate at the end of July, when McConnell also froze in the middle of a press conference and had to be led away, returning several minutes later to finish taking questions.

    (Reporting by Kanishka Singh and Richard Cowan in Washington; editing by Scott Malone, Caitlin Webber and Susan Heavey)


    The original article contains 174 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 1%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • c0c0c0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everybody looking forward to this man’s departure don’t realize what joy the great state of Kentucky has waiting in the wings. As bad as he is, he’s actually put a stop to some of the MAGA world’s worst nonsense. I’m not entirely confident that crazy is better than evil.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People already out here white washing Mitch McConnell, and the dude isn’t even dead yet…

      He is the head of the legislative branch of the GOP. He is the literal leader of the party. That means he’s responsible for the direction of that party.

      And no, he isn’t doing anything meaningful to stop MAGA from infecting (again, that’s literally his job) the GOP. He played a direct part in creating this beast, I couldn’t really care less if he’s lost control, or now pretends he bears no responsibility.

      And that’s not even including how he poisoned the Supreme Court for at least a generation.

      If objective evil exists, this man is it. Do yourself a favor and just stop trying to excuse this man’s words, actions, and behavior.

      I hope he suffers even a fraction of the pain he has caused others before he does us all a favor and fucking dies.

      • c0c0c0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure what part of me calling this guy “evil” is excusing his behavior. I’m just saying it could be worse and soon will be. Don’t go looking for drama.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not looking for drama. You defended Mitch McConnell, and said that he’s actually “put a stop” to some MAGA shit and that’s just laughably absurd

    • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this point, we all know anything the GOP puts forward will be worse than the last. The nice thing about ol’Turtle kicking-it is that his replacement will be a freshman without the power to control the Senate that turtle did.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re not going to replace the Senate Minority/Majority Leader with a freshman. Why would they do that?

        The senator from Kentucky that will take his place, will probably be a freshman, but it’s not like there is some rule that the Senator of Kentucky is the party leade on the national scale.

        They will replace him with another old white dude that’s been in politics for 60+ years.

        • CompostMaterial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I should clarify what I meant. His SEAT will be occupied by a freshman, which means that Kentucky will now be represented by a freshman Senator with no power as opposed to a Senate leader with way too much power. In other words, Kentucky is fucked as soon as he croaks.