What's with the sheer number of shutdowns recently? - eviltoast

I’ve never known so many shutdowns inside 2 weeks as the last two have been. Even websites pirating manga were shut down. What happened? What’s with this massive legal wave of shutdowns, and why now?

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because streaming services are enshittifying and too many people are sailing the seas as a result. Can’t let that happen.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      118
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      PerogiBoi here probably has it right. I remember during the heyday of Piracy in the early 2000’s strings of sites coming down, Comcast getting busted for illegally using Sandvine to throttle or even outright block bittorrent traffic, Limewire being sued for more money than existed in the entire monetary system of the planet at the time, and corruptly buying out the courts of a foreign country so we could put The Pirate Bay admins in prison.

      When people start putting on their piracy hats, they bring out the big legal guns.

      EDIT: I will literally never get over Limewire being sued for more money than existed. It proved, without a shadow of a doubt, in my mind, exactly how bullshit the fines for individual copyright violations are. If piracy resulted in more money than exists… you can’t prove to me that that is a lost sale. Because there literally was never enough money to have afforded the purchases to begin with.

      • Kayana@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Huh, TIL.

        Regarding your edit, that amount wasn’t the cumulated cost of whatever Limewire were distributing, that would be idiotic indeed; rather the RIAA tried to call for a ruling that somehow those guys were causing $150,000 in damages - per instance. Now the article unfortunately doesn’t state how they possibly tried to justify that number, and I can’t be bothered to research that myself. Another thing that would interest me is how the plaintiff expected them to pay with almost every dollar on Earth.

        So while I don’t think this had anything to do with “lost sales”, I do agree with the possible fines and damage calculations not being fit for any sort of realistic purpose at all.