A B.C. study gave 50 homeless people $7,500 each. Here's what they spent it on. - eviltoast

No reason not to do this across the board

  • pbjamm@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I bring this up because California implemented Prop13 in 1978 to address similar issues and it had mixed results.

    I agree with the idea of taxing secondary properties at a higher rate. But that could also have the unintended consequence of driving up rents and landlords look to recoup that money.