If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"? - eviltoast

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Leaving aside the problematic nature of the existing terms, the result was that people actually thought a little more about the relationships the things had and started using better/more precise terminology for the relationships: primary/secondary, active/hot/cold, parent/child, etc.

    Net positive all round.

    • Mellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Woah there. You’re using about 25% more of your brain than the rest of the internet. We’re gonna need you to tone that reasonability down a bit.

      I look forward to setting up my next polyamorous network connection. I can wait for the commands nmcli con choke me daddy ens1 thrupple0

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      This exactly. M/S ment nothing to me messing with HDDs as a kid.

      It arguably only makes sense in a control node/ worker node context, but worker is obvious enough in that context.