jeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 4 months agoActors demand action over 'disgusting' explicit video game sceneswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1160arrow-down123cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.worksghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonegaming@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldgames@lemmy.world
arrow-up1137arrow-down1external-linkActors demand action over 'disgusting' explicit video game sceneswww.bbc.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square64fedilinkcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.worksghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonegaming@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldgames@lemmy.world
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down7·4 months ago Misrepresenting? Please elaborate how I’m doing such a thing there are two issues here: the subject of the scenes, and the not being told about the subject. That’s how. By inventing the first issue. Nobody’s arguing for censorship. It’s only about the right to informed consent. saying I was Misrepresenting anything is flat out lying about my comment. Nope. You were inserting a strawman argument about censorship. That’s by definition misrepresenting.
minus-squarejeffw@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·4 months agoI feel like sometimes people comment, then read the article, and then try to backpedal when you point out that they missed the point of the article. Thanks for calling it out though
That’s how. By inventing the first issue. Nobody’s arguing for censorship. It’s only about the right to informed consent.
Nope. You were inserting a strawman argument about censorship. That’s by definition misrepresenting.
I feel like sometimes people comment, then read the article, and then try to backpedal when you point out that they missed the point of the article. Thanks for calling it out though