ISP to Supreme Court: We shouldn’t have to disconnect users accused of piracy - eviltoast

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18727811

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

  • Dept@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    But internet is a service provided by a private company that’s not affiliated with the government. Free speech only applies to government actions.

    • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No that’s not how it works, internet nowadays is a public place, just like a street/place is. Over 50% of social life nowadays is on the internet and its not provided by A provider, it a gigantic network of providers, governments and private people that make up the internet. And prohibiting access to that place (the isp is literally just a gatekeeper) is a violation of Freedom of speech, freedom of opinion and freedom of information.

      Also a law requiring them to prohibit people from access is the government…

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There is nothing in law to recognize the internet as a “public place”. Freedom of speech literally only protects your speech from governmental censorship. Simply does not apply online, no matter how much you want it to.