Kim Dotcom to be extradited from New Zealand to US - eviltoast
Justice minister signs extradition order for Megaupload founder 12 years after FBI-ordered raid over filesharing site

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/27004668

Kim Dotcom, who is facing criminal charges relating to the defunct file-sharing website Megaupload, is to be extradited to the US, the New Zealand justice minister has said.

German-born Dotcom has New Zealand residency and has been fighting extradition to the US since 2012 following an FBI-ordered raid on his Auckland mansion.

The justice minister, Paul Goldsmith, had signed an extradition order for Dotcom, a spokesperson said on Thursday.

“I considered all of the information carefully, and have decided that Mr Dotcom should be surrendered to the US to face trial,” Goldsmith said in a statement.

In a post on X on Tuesday, Dotcom said: “The obedient US colony in the South Pacific just decided to extradite me for what users uploaded to Megaupload,” in what appears to be a reference to the extradition order.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.mlEnglish
      442·
      3 months ago

      You have to differentiate between the pirate bay and Kim dotcom. The pirate bay has not sold the access to the media like he has.

      The huge difference is that he profited off of pirated media and pirate bay not. Kims incentive was always profit for himself.

      • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zoneEnglish
        13·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I’m kinda with you. If you’re becoming filthy rich off selling access to content others made then you’re fair game. If you’re just doing it for yourself / not profiting it’s a very different ball game though

        • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.orgEnglish
          4·
          3 months ago

          Didn’t he start his “career” with showing a hack on how to get free dial-up internet on German TV for fame and thereby ruining it for everyone because obviously the telco “fixed” the hack after that?

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          3 months ago

          babbling off into something that made no coherent sense. It’s so stupid that I’m not putting forth to clarify to you where I differentiated the two in because it’s plainly there. Kindly go fuck yourself.

          Ok.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      4·
      3 months ago

      I’m absolutely with you for the copyright part. I didn’t follow the story but isn’t part of it also because of money laundering? I’m not sure if I’m confusing different cases here, just asking because you may remember more.

        • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          2·
          3 months ago

          Oh man I’m stupid, it’s in the article. I’ve read OPs summary and somehow checked it off as “read the article” and I was wondering why that wasn’t mentioned.

          Of course the money laundering accusations are a farce, I just thought they’d keep on that for the extradition.